Greek history reading analyze in comparing character of Helen in two Essay

classical history reading analyze in comparing character of Helen in two reading - establish ExampleIn this account, Helen is portrayed as a dupe of circumstances who had no choice only when to go with Paris and succumb to his every whim and demand in order to save her demeanor. In the poem we see Helen dressed herself in fine silvery linens and came out of her bedroom crying gently when she heard of Menelaus attack on Sparta clearly illustrating she had no alternative but to wait and see what the airstream of the war will bring for her future.Later, talking to Pariss father, she says, closing should have been a sweeter evil to me explaining that she should have taken her own life than yield to Pariss seizure. She incriminates herself by calling herself a shameless bitch for yielding to his demands. Furthermore, she is seen as very embarrassed to have had her family find her in a situation which she apparently had no choice. in that respect are several colors to Helens charac ter that are portrayed in Homers Iliad. She calls herself a hateful wife when she thinks of Menelaus winning her a government agency from Paris. On Pariss return and eventual defeat in the Trojan War, Helen reproofs him by relation back him he should have been killed by Menelaus, a real heroIn the Iliad, Helen is represented as a prey plucked from her serene life with her husband and taken away by Paris to be subjected to subservience despite her many objections. She is shown to have compassion, guilt, love and even acceptance in the way she lives her life in Pariss kingdom awaiting her end.However, in Helen a play by Euripides, the playwright charges the theory that Helen was a victim of circumstances down and has something else to say. Helen is sought by Menelaus, a grieving husband, who wants to bring her to justice by kill her following the rumors that she went to Paris willingly and was not abducted after all. Hecuba, Pariss mother describes Helen as a woman who captivates you with hungriness, destroys cities and sets homes aflame. While Helen defends herself dictum that she was bought and sold for her beauty and has been blameless even attempting to run away, Hecuba negates this by saying she should have hung herself if she was so desperate to get out. Helen states she was kept as a wife by her modernistic husband in defiance of the Trojans and Hecuba negates that as well. She is characterized as a vicious and calculating woman who Hecuba states truism my son in the splendor of gold and looked forward to a deluge of extravagance while Helen says she grieves the death of the Trojans. This is a total contradiction to what the Homer states in the Iliad.Essentially, Helen has been depicted as the cause of the war betwixt the Trojans and the Greeks whatever the truth may or may not have been. Homer too has hardened Helen as a cause of war but also as a helpless victim of her celebrated beauty.There could be any number of reasons why Euripides depict ed Helen in a banish light. Some scholars say that it is impossible for so many heads of states / cities to leave their work to go all the way to Troy to rescue a chit of a woman to whom they did not have much pursuit in except for her renowned beauty. At the time this story is placed, a lot of women and children were abducted and sold in slavery in Troy and it is thought by some scholars that this was the reason so many metropolis heads brought about the Trojan War. This theory is followed by the hypothesis that Helen never existed It was all a ply to put the Trojans down for their illegal slave trade. However, if