Does God Exist? :: essays research papers

In my brio on this planet I have come to skepticism galore(postnominal) things that many take on as blind faith. We all spang that someday we go forth physically die, Yet, we continuously deny the forces working inside ourselves which wishing to search out the true outcome of what whitethorn or may not come after death. Its far easier for humanity to accept that they will go on to a safe haven and be forgiven for all, instead than to question the make itence of a super omnipotent being. Fortunately, there argon some of us who tend to question the whys and hows that come before us. We question the creation of humanity and the religious teachings received from our parents, our church and our society. This paper examines the many rational arguments for and against the existence of God. It is based on the views of some of the great philosophers and scientists of our world. I will show that there is no sufficient proof or comprehensive arguments for the existence of God. Some peo ple search for eternal pacification through the beliefs in God but this is an im feasible belief because of the chances, the plausibility, and because of science. ontological ARGUMENTS God generally refers to one supreme, holy, personal being,. The divine unity of supreme good-ness and of ultimate reality. St. Anselm of Canterbury developed what we have learned to be the ontological argument. He began his argument by saying that even a print clear grasp or understand the concept of "a being than of which nobody greater can be conceived." He continues to state that a fool would say that the concept of this beings existence is only when in his mind and in the mind of others but not in reality. However he in addition admits to the possibility of this being existing in reality. Whatever is understood by the fool is argued that than which nothing is greater can be conceived cannot solely exist in the mind but also in reality, hence, God exists. (Angelfire) This personally sounds like a salespersons pitch to confuse and conquer for a sale. Gaunilo felt up the same. He frequently debated with St. Anselm on behalf of the fool. He stated that it was not possible to visualize the concept of this perfect being because one can only imagine an image when one has an idea of what that image is suppose to resemble.