Effective Communication Inside the Courtroom Essay -- Court Communicat

Effective Communication Inside the judicatureDo you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing moreover the truth so help you God? This is a statement that is ofttimes heard inside the homageroom, one that all must swear to as they attempt to testify in a court of law. The constitution of the united secernates allows impeach to be judged by a gore of their peers to determine their evil or innocence (Abadinsky, 1995). In order for that to take countersink a trial must be conducted to allow the evidence to be presented. In order for that to bump the state must consume its attorneys present the facts that have been discovered. It is the responsibility of the state attorney or prosecutor to convince the members of the instrument panel that the events being presenting ar true and that as members of society they should find the accused guilty and thus assess some type of penalty. At the comparable time it is the job of the defense attorneys to persuade the jury to f ind their knob not guilty based on their story. In order for this to happen both the prosecution and the defiance must effectively communicate with the members of the jury and with other members of the court in an attempt to prevail. The proper communication techniques are very important in presenting ones case. Communication must take place between attorneys and clients, between opposite counsel and with the judge, but most signifi sewertly with the jury. Statement of the ProblemThus, the research question for this study is How do attorneys effectively communicate inside the courtroom? Attorneys are defined as officers of the court authorized to appear before it as a representative of a party in a legal controversy. Communicate is defined as to impart knowledge, to make known, to d... ...s paper article Lewis, N.A. (2001, September 9). Plans for web supervise in courts dropped.The New York Times, 51,871, 34-35.9. An Article in a scholarly daybook with continuous pagination Beitz, C. (2000). Rawlss law of peoples. Ethics, 110, 669-696.10. An article in a scholarly journal that paginates each issue separately Durrell, D.D (2000). Durrell as a teacher. Journal of education, 182, 135- 158.11. A film or video tape sureness of Justice (Producer) & Richardson, J.G. (Writer/Director). (1997). Bias in the courtroom. microfilm. United States National Center for State Courts.12. An article off of the internet Ramsey, G. (March 1999). Communication theories on trial can the scales of justice be swayed by the application of communication theories? Communication & the law. Retrieved (September 17, 2001) from http// ehostgvw9.epnet.com